So after today’s presentations, I think it is hitting me a
lot harder that we are in a position to make a decision that will really affect
other people’s lives. Seeing the presenters’ dedication and enthusiasm for what
they do, and seeing how happy they were when we complimented them on the
strengths of their presentations made this decision seem much more real, and
not a contrived experience to employ the theory we’ve learned all semester.
With that said, I’d just like to reflect on the things I heard today and maybe
continue the discussion we all so eagerly wanted to have at the end of class.
I’ll start with the Hope Dispensary. I thought it was a very
well thought out, comprehensive presentation. I loved that they took the time
to explain the healthcare system to us, and explained to us that not all
low-income individuals qualify for government assistance. I think they are a
one-of-a-kind organization, unlike the many food pantries, children centers,
etc., that serves a very basic community need. They are focused on systemic
change, not just providing temporary relief. Although this was not the most
charismatic duo, they seemed just as passionate and chose to work in this field
instead of making a larger salary in the for-profit sector. Also, as for
operating costs, I don’t think this should dissuade us from donating, but I do
think a more concrete breakdown of their expenses would be nice. However, we
can’t expect them to continue the good work that they do if they can’t afford
to pay their talented staff, their rent, or their electric bill, etc. Lastly, I
wish they had more information on their outcomes, such as the number of people
that have “graduated” from their programs. I would also be curious to know how
many people they serve, or have served overall.
I liked how the Family Enrichment Network focused on numbers
and they were very clear with the breakdown of what they were asking us to fund.
The prices of individual toys make it very easy to see exactly the impact our donation
can have. They seem to serve a significant number of kids and are based in many
locations, serving a wide area. It also looks like they have a solid structure
and competent management, considering their growth from decades ago to now. I
think it’s great that they collect data three or four times a year depending on
the program, but I wish they were better able to work with the schools or the
parents to collect data from children that were no longer using their services.
They seemed to have a good system in place for keeping these toys in good condition
and usable for a long time.
Lastly, as we all agreed, I found Debbie from the Soup and
Sandwich Program very engaging and energetic. I think she told her story well
and very effectively illustrated the effect her organization has on their
“guests” and volunteers. However, and this is a big however, I do not think
that we should get too carried away by her likability. The presenter’s
personality is not indicative of the organization’s effectiveness,
responsibility, or importance to the community. I personally am not a fan of
anecdotal evidence. It certainly has its place, especially when trying to get a
feel for an organization, but I think the numbers and outcomes are most
important. Anecdotes are not necessarily representative of all people served. Debbie
didn’t have any numbers for the impact they had on the community, and granted
I’m not sure how one would quantify their impact, but I think this is much more
persuasive than a feel-good story. Overall, I think this organization is providing
temporary relief for a systemic problem. This organization is not taking steps
toward solving poverty or hunger, but providing one meal a week to anyone who
stops by. I also think it is very telling that their funding was recently cut by
donors who decided to donate to other, larger food providers in the community.
In conclusion, I think the most important organizations are
those with solid results reporting and those working towards systemic change in
a certain issue area. I think the Hope Dispensary is the closest to fulfilling
these requirements, despite the fact that they need improved results reporting.
I think we can expect this from them in the near future and we should be
slightly forgiving right now since they are a newer organization. What do you
think?
Dana,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading this post, and I definitely agree with you when it comes to the Family Enrichment Network, as I believe that they are certainly a safe, and smart decision when donating. However, I saw the presentations of the Hope Dispensary and the Soup and Sandwich Program a little differently. First I'll begin with the Hope Dispensary. I believe that their mission is noble, and that this organization clearly provides the members of the community with something that they might not otherwise be able to afford, essentially saving their lives. However, I think that the group of people that the Hope Dispensary helps is much smaller, and that the only way these people are helped is if they seek out help. I believe that this is very important to note, that if people do not come forward to seek out the help from the organization, they might not get the medications that they need. I think that the fact that the organization does not reach out as much, and that their "target group" is small can certainly pose a problem, this is just something to keep in mind.
As far as the Soup and Sandwich Program goes, I would have to agree with you that Debbie's enthusiasm and anecdotal evidence are not what we can solely go on. However, I'm not sure what other kind of evidence you're looking for. The program is not one which aims its efforts at a certain group of people, merely those who are in need of a free meal, and some conversation. With this being said, I believe that it would be difficult for someone like Debbie to not be charismatic and passionate about what she does. While her charisma does not mean that the program is successful, it certainly cannot be discounted. As such, I believe that the only way we can truly judge the efficacy of the program is to visit on Saturday and judge for ourselves, why not join us!?
Hey Dana!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you on a lot of your comments about the presentations. I enjoy how you spoke about both the negative parts of the presentations as well as the positive parts of each presentation. To begin, I think the Hope Dispensary did a good job explaining their organization and breaking down the healthcare system in simplistic terms that still managed to make us feel like adults. I appreciated their professionalism, but I agree that they definitely needed to keep track of their outcomes better and they need to have a better breakdown of how they would spend the grant money. In class, a few people were talking about how they did not enjoy how they were not very engaging and excited. Realistically, how would you feel if Debbie was giving the presentation instead? I really would have not taken the Hope Dispensary seriously and I do not think that other grant makers would have either. Health concerns aren't something I take lightly and I feel that it would have taken the need out of the program. As for the Family Enrichment Network, I thought their presentation was great and they need the grant money, but with what Sam spoke about in class, I almost feel that they’re not trying all that hard to find the funds that they need for their program. I just googled “toys r us non-profit” and the information popped right up. I really hope they look into this program and they don’t just dismiss Sam’s comment. Finally, the Soup and sandwich program was certainly an interesting presentation. Debbie showed a large amount of spunk and probably got most of the class on board, but we do need to be careful with anecdotal evidence as well as letting our feelings for Debbie get in the way. I definitely think this program is a great one, but I think the site visit is a must to see how it is run and to see how many people are actually affected.