After first ruling out incomplete applications,
non-501(c)3 charities, and non-local charities, I had my hands full. I
basically used the criteria of best impact to narrow it down… some charities I
would love to have an impact with, but if the impact was vague, or included funds
that would simply have to be raised again next year, I cut them. This helped me
immensely in such a tough decision. However, there was still some vagueness, for
instance – is a 3-year impact long or short-term? The next criteria I used was
if the organization seemed to have a specific idea in mind about how to use our
money. Lastly, I picked organizations in education since that was our class
issue area. That may not be exactly fair, but there were so many good ones I
had to do something. We can tell organizations that we identified education as
the greatest need and their organization didn’t fall into it. I do have
emotions and some of the organizations below may not fit perfectly into what I have
just said, in those cases it means that I saw that the need was great in our
area.
My last comment would be that there seems to be several
instances where $2500 or less can FULLY meet the need. I would love to FULLY
meet the need of 4 places (because I realize that arbitrarily dividing up the
money just so we don’t feel bad isn’t a good idea). This just seems to be a
year where there are some smaller needs, and I would love to impact those,
rather than the bigger, “defraying” grants.
EPAC
--good expense budget
--EPAC has assisted many local school and community theater groups by
providing costumes, props, and scenery for their shows at little or no charge
for their productions
--currently collaborating with BU students
IMPACT: replacing
computers may be put off because the volunteers see the kids as a greater need,
they can “deal” with the slow computers, however a staff member should not have
a computer that is crashing in the middle of their hard work, should not have a
lag or wait for start-up. Exact amount for an iMac desktop = about $1500
Family Enrichment Network
--from Vision Statement on webpage: When advocating for
the implementation of services, we are supportive of existing or potential
providers while avoiding duplication of services.
--huge variety of programs
IMPACT: clear
difference between without our money (indoor learning) and with our money
(outdoor learning), cuts due to financial crisis, other programs have been
maintained
Boys and Girls Club
--address multiple issues areas – POVERTY and
COMPLIMENTARY EDUCATION
--holistic approach (nutrition, exercise, college assistance,
hw helps, etc.)
Some staff members have been at the Club for decades and still regularly
stay after hours and come in on weekends for no extra pay. They pay out of
their own pocket for program supplies.
IMPACT:
computers – inability to efficiently provide service if computers are running
slow (I know I personally struggled with my own HW ‘til I got a new laptop in
October)
Baseball field – offer a new service
Art and Fun Club supplies – will run out
SOS Shelter
--actively changing and adapting program, seeking out
grants
IMPACT: cover
areas not covered, provide women with safety, URGENT need (6 months), fully
cover cost, lasts a while
YWCA
IMPACT: --WOMENS
ISSUES and EDUCATION and POVERTY
--finish a playground that was supposed to be finished
upon completion, but not enough funds were received
Catholic Charities
The Teen
Transitional Living Program (TTLP) is the only supportive housing program for
homeless youth in Broome County.
IMPACT:
jumpstart a program that will become self-sufficient through profits
Discovery Center
In a time when educational practice
is heavily focused on preparing children for standardized testing, play-based
learning expands a child’s educational experience to include visual, tactile
and kinesthetic learning opportunities. Experiential play encourages the
promotion of abstract thinking and creativity with a deep conceptual
understanding that can be translated into life skills that prepare a child for
future academic success.
IMPACT: new
exhibit for 3 years, exact cost: 2500
Kopernik Observatory
IMPACT:
prevent a $25,000 piece of equipment from being damaged for $1500, allow summer
activities to go on
Michelle, reading your thought process really helped me with my own when reading through all of the applications. Like you, I had a hard time making decisions to help narrow down all of the options. I found myself struggling because there are so many good causes out there and many proposals that I was interested in. Some proposals were well written but I wasn't passionate about the cause, while others were poorly written or less persuasive, but their cause really touched my heart. I like how you divided it up into cost, and I think it is an interesting idea to think about. If we can help multiple organizations with our money then should we try to help as many as we can by dividing up the money to make the biggest impact? I know this is a debate we have had in many forms over the past couple of weeks, but now that we have actual numbers and ideas in front of us we can really test our thoughts.
ReplyDeleteI found that when I was reading, and re-reading through applications, I was more interested in organizations that clearly and directly defined what they would do with the money. Organizations that gave a vague reiteration of their cause made me feel like they made less of an effort, and that the money would not be going to use the way I want it to.
I still have a lot of decisions to make, but I appreciate reading about your thought process. It helped me to make some tough decisions of my own.